Bacillus safensis
Bacillus safensis is an aerobic, spore-forming bacterium originally isolated from spacecraft assembly facilities and studied primarily in environmental and agricultural contexts. In vitro research has characterized its lipase-producing capacity, antimicrobial compound production, and plant growth-promoting properties such as phosphate solubilization. No research specifically addressing its probiotic potential in humans or animals was identified in the current evidence base. It is not a recognized probiotic strain, and available data do not support health-benefit claims for this organism.
Where it's been studied Tags come from a conservative keyword scan of each paper's title, abstract, and summary. A tag is research coverage, not measured effect. How we classify this →
Share of this strain's 61 body-system-tagged papers that concern each system. Research coverage, not measured effect.
+3 more systems
Symptoms in the research A tag means the paper's text names the symptom or condition — research coverage, not evidence of benefit. How we classify this →
Share of this strain's 10 symptom-tagged papers that mention each symptom or condition. Research coverage, not evidence of benefit.
Strains of this species
4 strains of Bacillus safensis in the index, with 3 linked papers between them.
Bacillus safensis DIWL 3
Bacillus safensis DIWL-3 is a strain with no strain-specific published evidence available in the current literature index.
Bacillus safensis SMAH
Bacillus safensis SMAH is represented in the research index by a single 2026 in vitro study examining its capacity for biosorption and biodegradation of methylene blue dye from polluted soil and wastewater — a bioremedia…
Bacillus safensis YX8 D
Bacillus safensis YX8-D has no strain-specific papers recorded in the current evidence database.
Bacillus safensis KE4K
Bacillus safensis KE4K is a bacterial endophyte, a microorganism living inside plant tissue, isolated from Teclea nobilis, a Kenyan medicinal plant.
Research Study-type filters use AI-classified labels, audited but not guaranteed — check the paper itself before leaning on one. How we classify this →
534 papers reference this strain in the probiotic database.
Discussion
Be the first to comment.
Sign in to join the discussion.